Subscribe to our Blog
The collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge will go down in history as one of the largest marine insured losses on record in the United States. Marine insurance, property damage, business interruption, and liability policies were all triggered at once—creating a cross-class clash that underscores the importance of insight-driven exposure management that consolidates views across classes in real-time. A vessel collides with a bridge, and suddenly, insurers must assess damages across marine hull, cargo, property, and liability classes—each with different policy terms, exclusions, and recovery pathways.
As most insurers still rely on siloed data and fragmented risk assessments, creating a comprehensive, real-time view of their exposure is still a challenge. However, by digitally capturing and maintaining a portfolio view assets by class, and associated Insurance coverages and terms with live exposure monitoring, insurers can see the full impact of an event as it unfolds, enabling faster decision-making and better risk mitigation steps. The Baltimore bridge collapse is not just a case study in infrastructure failure and tragic loss of life—it’s a lesson in why the future of insurance depends on cross-class risk intelligence.
Assessing the aftermath
The collapse of the Key Bridge was an economic shock to Baltimore and the surrounding region. The bridge served as a vital link to the Port of Baltimore, one of the busiest shipping hubs on the East Coast. Its sudden loss forced companies to reroute shipments, increasing costs and delays, with the estimated cost of rebuilding the Francis Scott Key Bridge ranging between $1.7 billion and $1.9 billion.
Following the event, multiple lines of insurance were triggered simultaneously:
-
Marine Insurance: The immediate concern was the vessel involved in the collision—hull and machinery coverage for ship damage, protection and indemnity (P&I) claims, and cargo losses for goods stranded due to the disruption.
-
Property Insurance: The bridge itself was a critical piece of infrastructure, likely covered under government-backed property policies. The cost of rebuilding, along with potential liability claims, added another layer of complexity.
-
Business Interruption & Contingent Business Interruption (CBI): The shutdown of the Baltimore port disrupted supply chains, leading to losses for businesses that relied on this major trade hub.
-
Liability & Subrogation Issues: Determining who is responsible for the collapse is key—whether it’s the vessel owner, the port authority, or other third parties. Insurers will need to navigate subrogation and complex liability disputes across multiple policies.
Despite pre-construction evaluations now in progress and the re-constructed bridge slated for completion in 2028, this event will remain an example that highlights the growing urgency for insurers to move beyond traditional, single-line exposure management. In today’s risk landscape, where major losses increasingly cut across multiple coverage types, insurers need a real-time, consolidated view of their exposures. Technology may hold the key in unlocking it.
An aerial photo of the damage
Data quality and speed to insight
Traditional exposure management can be slow, with fragmented, distributed data stored across classes. In an event like the Baltimore bridge collapse, speed to insight can make all the difference between a proactive response and chaotic claims processing.
One of the biggest challenges insurers face in such catastrophic events is data overload. Traditional methods rely on manual exposure tracking, delayed data reconciliation, and fragmented risk modeling, making it difficult to get a clear picture of total exposure. This slows down claims handling, increases uncertainty in pricing, and exposes insurers to unforeseen aggregation risks.
With technology-driven solutions like Insurwave, insurers can:
- Ingest and process submission data across multiple classes quickly—ensuring bound business is quickly reflected in the live portfolios that are being monitored.
- Apply AI-powered enrichment to improve portfolio data accuracy and reduce blind spots.
- Monitor evolving threats in real-time to better anticipate losses rather than react to them.
- Consolidate a view of exposures across classes for a true 360-degree risk view.
By leveraging predictive analytics and cross-class exposure modeling, insurers can better understand the ripple effects of catastrophic events and price risk more effectively—a crucial capability as the industry braces for potential pricing shifts following the Francis Scott Key Bridge disaster.
Pricing pressures
Catastrophic events like the Baltimore bridge collapse inevitably reshape underwriting practices and pricing models. The question isn’t just how much insurers will pay out, but how this event will impact future premium rates, risk appetites, and coverage availability across multiple insurance classes.
In the marine and cargo insurance sector, having to tackle one of the largest marine losses in recent history, underwriters may reassess how they price coverage for vessels navigating high-risk infrastructure zones. Similarly, inflation and social inflation may cause claims to skyrocket. On the infrastructure and property insurance side, insurers may demand higher premiums for bridges, ports, and transportation hubs, requiring better risk assessments and stronger safety protocols. As we saw from the incident, failure to adapt safety measures or aging of infrastructure can cause or contribute significantly to disasters.
Looking to impact beyond the costs of the bridge itself, the extended port closure had ripple effects across industries which could drive up pricing for business interruption policies and introduce new risk exclusions. Toll income losses totalled close to $53m while eleven larger vessels were blocked during and after the incident and will likely incur further losses.
Technology-enabled resilience for cross-class risk
Ultimately, insurers equipped with live x-class portfolio monitoring will have a competitive advantage in navigating these pricing shifts. By leveraging AI-driven risk modeling, and predictive analytics, firms can proactively adjust their underwriting strategies, rather than reacting after losses occur.